Showing posts with label Neil Gaiman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Neil Gaiman. Show all posts

Monday, March 17, 2025

Archer’s Goon has many layers

While I don’t think you can possibly describe Diana Wynne Jones as a forgotten author, I think you can get away with calling her an under appreciated one. 

Even though I’ve been reading her work for… most of my life? Yeah, most of my life. I am still astonished at how many books she wrote, particularly how many I haven’t read yet. And she influenced so many authors. Wikipedia lists Terry Pratchett, Philip Pullman, Penelope Lively, Robin McKinley, Megan Whalen Turner, Dina Rabinovitch, Neil Gaiman and J.K Rowling as authors who cite her as an influence. (No, I don’t know all of them but there are some huge names on that list)

So it’s safe to safe modern fantasy, particularly urban fantasy, young adult fantasy and children’s fantasy, would look different without her.

Okay, the actual book I just read was Archer’s Goon, which I hadn’t read since around when it came out in paperback. And, honestly, the only thing I really remembered was the twist. 

Spoilers

Spoilers

Spoilers

Spoilers

Spoilers

Major spoilers 

Spoilers

Spoilers

Seriously, I’m going to talk about the big reveal 

Spoilers

Spoilers

Spoilers

Howard Sykes is a thirteen-year-old boy who comes home to find that a huge man with a tiny head sitting in the kitchen, claiming to be from Archer and that he needs two thousand typed words from Howard’s father.

As the story unfolds, we learn that the town is controlled by seven siblings with great, undefined powers. And they are trapped in the town and Howard’s father’s typing is apparently part of it. 

(Neil Gaiman has stated that Archer’s Goon is one of his favorite children’s book he read as an adult. And Sandman is centered around seven dysfunctional siblings. Seriously, how much of the modern fantasy landscape exists because of Jones?!)

The structure of the story has Howard and his family hunt down the different siblings with the help of the goon and learning more about them. Each sibling controls a certain aspect of the town like crime or housing or electricity. And they have the interest and ability to rule the world if they were free.

Okay. Twist time. Big time spoilers.

Howard eventually learns that the goon was lying about working for Archer. He’s actually one of the siblings. And Howard learns that he was adopted and he’s one of the siblings too. He’s just going through his third childhood due to time travel shenanigans.

In fact, the real reason the siblings are trapped in the town in because it is the will of their parents to protect Howard when he is too young to use his powers or know himself.

I cannot emphasize enough how little we learn about what the siblings are. We don’t know where they came from, if they are human, how their powers actually work. We don’t even know if the parents are alive or dead. It’s really quite impressive. 

What Archer’s Goon does do is explore the nature of families. We have Howard’s biological and adopted families, both of which are hot messes. However, his adopted family is loving and ultimately supportive which is something his biological family isn’t good at. 

When Howard is able to see what his adult self was like, the one who set the whole time travel mess in motion for purely selfish reasons, he finds a total jerk who is actually worse than the other siblings. And while it isn’t quite explicitly spelled out, it’s clear that his adopted family is how he can turn out better than that.

I remember liking Archer’s Goon when I first read it back in the 80s. Now, though, I think it’s downright brilliant. It is enthralling character study as well as a commentary about family. It is important to note that the siblings are not depicted as monsters but as dysfunctional and that some of them are trying to do better.

Archer’s Goon may supposed to be a children’s book but I had to be a grownup to appreciate it.

Monday, August 15, 2022

My earliest Sandman memories

 With The Sandman having been turned into a TV series, that’s taken me down memory lane. Probably enough for two or three blogs lol


I have heard a number of folks say that there was nothing like Sandman before it came out and there hasn’t been anything like it since. Which seems pretty extreme but, at least as far as comic books are concerned, I’m not sure they are wrong.

But, I have to say, I didn’t get that impression with my first experience with it.

It was issue 7, Sound and Fury, the issue that wrapped up Morpheus’s quest for his tools and his duel with Doctor Destiny, an old Justice League villain of all things. Without any context, it didn’t make much sense. Why did the pale guy turn into some kind of God at the end?

If I had the issue before, the nightmare 24 Hours, or the issue after, the charming Sound of Her Wings, I’d have been sold. But issue 7, possibly the worse issue to start with out of the entire series.

No, I wouldn’t get interested in Sandman until I found and read the Doll’s House graphic novel. And this was back before graphic novels and collected editions became an industry standard. And this was also when they still included the Sound of Her Wings. 

Then I was hooked. I started getting every issue with #19.

And I still recommend friends who haven’t read Sandman start with Doll’s House. If they like it, they will be good for the whole ride. And if they don’t, they can be done.







Tuesday, February 20, 2018

Oh, so that’s what the Graveyard Book is about!

I didn’t realize that the Graveyard Book was Neil Gaiman’s version of the Jungle Book (only in a graveyard!) until the afterwards. Which is particularly funny since I found myself thinking that The Witch’s Headstone followed the structure of The King’s Ankus. (Yes, I’ve read the Second Jungle Book)

The Graveyard Book won lots of awards, even by Neil Gaiman standards. However, it somehow went over my head when it came out. Life has a way back of being complicated that way :P

I just finished the book up and I have a feeling that, as time goes by, I’m going to like and appreciate the book more and more. Rereading it knowing that it is a tribute to Kipling will probably really help. I might reread the two Jungle Books and then reread the Graveyard Book.

At the end of the book, I really wanted and didn’t want a sequel. (Although I understand The Ocean At The End Of the Lane shares a setting so that might count in some ways :P) Part of me wanted to know what happens next to Nob and more about all the mysterious and apparently epic stuff that happened off-screen. On the other hand, I think that would weaken the work a lot. Sometimes, what we don’t know makes us treasure what we do know.

When I was actually reading the book, I amused and I enjoyed myself. However, I didn’t find myself thinking that it was one of Gaiman’s greats. But, looking back, looking at the ways he subverted my expectations and restrained himself to keep the mystery alive, I think it is.

Yeah, this will get reread.